Related Research

Least-Cost Avoiders in Online Fraud and Abuse

Assessing and Improving the Safety of Internet Search Engines

False and Deceptive Pay-Per-Click Ads

Racial Discrimination in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from a Field Experiment.

Federal Limitations on Regulating Online Marketplaces

February 6, 2018

Perhaps the most beloved twenty-six words in tech law, §230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 has been heralded as a “masterpiece” and the “law that gave us the modern Internet.” It was originally designed to protect online companies from defamation claims for third-party speech (think message boards and AOL chat rooms), but over the years §230 has been used to protect online firms from all kinds of regulation—including civil rights and consumer protection laws. As a result, it is now the first line of defense for online marketplaces seeking to avoid state and local regulation.

In our new working paper From the Digital to the Physical: Federal Limitations on Regulating Online Marketplaces, Abbey Stemler and I challenge existing interpretations of §230 and highlight how it and other federal laws interfere with state and local government’s ability to regulate online marketplaces—particularly those that dramatically shape our physical realties, such as Uber and Airbnb. §230 is sacred to many, but as Congress considers revising §230 and Courts continually reassess its interpretation, we hope our paper will encourage a richer discussion about the duties of online marketplaces.